Episode 9: Magic Bullets
- Sasha Borissenko
- Oct 1, 2023
- 6 min read
Updated: Dec 4

*Editorial note: This article was originally published in the NZ Herald and follows New Zealand English conventions.
As the government grapples with removing GST from fruit and vegetables but sidesteps any talk of a sugar tax, episode 9 explores why soft drinks are so cheap at your local supermarket.
Ever wondered why there’s an entire supermarket aisle dedicated to fizzy drinks for two-for-one prices and yet a head of cabbage costs $6.99?
Monopoly Watch NZ spokesman Tex Edwards told Chewing the Facts it’s because rebates are paid to people who sell certain brands.
Rebates can include large suppliers paying supermarkets to exclusively stock the supplier’s products or a portion of fridge or shelf space, he said.
“These financial payments camouflage the true price of what a bottle of Coke is or the incentives a retailer is given to sell it to you.”
For companies that have market power, rebates tend to be illegal in other countries, he said.
It means Coca-Cola New Zealand is one of the company’s most profitable branches per capita, Edwards said.
As of May 2021, Coca-Cola’s shares were worth US$230 billion, making it the second-largest international food and beverage corporation behind Nestlé.
Coca-Cola’s New Zealand arm made a gross profit of $380 million for the year ending December last year.
A 2021 study found the company dominated the global fizzy drinks market in 2020 at 47 per cent, with Pepsi coming in second at 19 per cent.
Coca-Cola made up 57 per cent of the Australasian market. Coca-Cola declined to comment.
The situation is exacerbated by New Zealand’s reluctance to introduce a sugar tax, Edwards said.
More than 50 countries have some sort of sugar tax. A World Health Organisation review in 2022 assessed 86 studies and found a sugar tax was linked to a fifteen per cent drop in sales and no negative effect on employment rates.
Last year, the Commerce Commission released its draft for consultation on the Misuse of Market Power Guidelines. It found that rebates and discounts offered to retailers or distributors by a supplier with substantial market power could harm competition by reducing the ability of other suppliers to compete effectively.
Food and Grocery Council CEO Raewyn Bleakley said consumers decided to purchase certain products, which led to greater supply.
“In every market you have the 80-20 rule... generally [sic] applies where you have a smaller number of large companies because scale and having global reach has benefits. That’s business, that’s the world we live in.”
Suppliers provided the product to the supermarkets and “they certainly may entertain and negotiate different promotions and fund those, but it is ultimately the retailers that make those decisions”.
A Foodstuffs spokesperson said the cost of goods from suppliers was the largest cost to its business, making up 68 cents of every retail dollar on the shelf.
“Other factors include the cost of getting the product onto the shelf, whether the product is in good supply and if it’s on or off special.”
A Woolworths spokesperson said it had a range of commercial agreements, including rebate agreements that are negotiated with suppliers.
“We can’t share details as this is commercially sensitive to the suppliers we deal with.”
Finite shelf space required balancing product, shelf space, and storage availability.
In August commerce and consumer affairs minister Duncan Webb released the new Grocery Supply Code to even the level playing field between suppliers and supermarkets.
A Commerce Commission spokesperson said the code addressed rebates by ensuring terms of supply were clear and supermarkets couldn’t charge rebates unless written into agreements that were expressly agreed to by suppliers.
New rules around wholesaling meant grocery stores would have to reveal the scale and efficiency of their business, including volume rebates.
New Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden can also take action if necessary.
Chewing the Facts: produced with the NZ Herald, with support from NZ On Air.
Research and Sources:
The Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in the Global Epidemics of Obesity and Chronic Diseases
Public Service Commission: Standards of Integrity and Conduct
Food Prices and Obesity: Evidence and Policy Implications for Taxes and Subsidies
New Zealand Parliament: Schools—Healthy Food National Administration Guideline
Transparency International: Corruption Perceptions Index
Ministry of Justice: Political Lobbyist Code of Conduct Meetings
The Revolving Door Between Government and the Alcohol, Food, and Gambling Industries in Australia
OAG Decision to not Investigate Katherine Rich Disappointing
Katherine Rich Stands Firm Against Call to Resign After Allegations of Conflict
Sellman v Slater [2017] NZHC 2392; [2018] 2 NZLR 218 (2 October 2017)
Which Companies Dominate the Packaged Food Supply of New Zealand and How Healthy are their Products?
The 100 Largest Companies in the World by Market Capitalization in 2023
Table 2 Global and Regional Market Shares Held by Coca-Cola Co and PepsiCo, 2020
Nutrition Policy in Whose Interests? A New Zealand Case Study
How do Vested Interests Maintain Outdated Policy? The Case of Food Marketing to New Zealand
Artificial Sweeteners as a Sugar Substitute: Are they Really Safe?
The Ompact of a Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax on Oral Health and Costs of Dental Care in Australia
Countries that have Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs)
Ounces of Prevention - The Public Policy Case for Taxing Sugared Beverages



Comments